Should I make a podcast of my own? It has been suggested over and over again. I must say I cannot even get done with simple audio promos for this blog. (Who will make a new one?
There is only one so far)
But here is another idea. I could set up a feed for podcasts I especially recommend. You could subscribe in iTunes or any other podcatcher you use and get those recommendations in one list. Would you be interested in that? Comment or send mail to let me know.
There are several ways open. I could make a feed for everything I listen to (up to 4 podcasts a day), make one for every podcast I review (around 1 or 2 a day), give special recommendations (1 or 2 per week) or make separate feeds. A history feed, a philosophy feed, a Dutch, German and Hebrew feed etc. Give me your input and some time in July this feed (or these feeds) will come into place. And if you are willing to beta-test, all the better.
In the mean time, let us list the podcasts that have been given a first review this month:
Philosophy:
Isaiah Berlin Centenary (Oxford) (
review,
Oxford on iTunes,
feed)
Series of lectures to commemorate a hundred years since the birth of Isaiah Berlin. One lecture about him, the rest recordings from lectures by Berlin in the 1950s.
Ethics Bites (BBC, Open University) (
review,
site,
feed)
An ethics series by the makers of Philosophy Bites. The feed has not been updated since 2008, but ethics can never be podfaded, can it?
Reith Lectures 2009 (BBC) (
review,
site,
feed)
An excellent series of four lectures by Micheal Sandel about a new citizenship. Fresh insights about morality in market, politics and bio-medical technology.
History:
Early American Social History (Warwick) (
review,
page in iTunes,
feed in iTunes)
Extensive lecture series about US History before 1870. Mind the low audio that comes with live recorded lectures.
Georgian Britain (Warwick) (
review,
page in iTunes,
feed in iTunes)
Series of thematic monologues about Britain during 1714-1830.
Guns and Rubles (Warwick) (
review,
page in iTunes,
feed in iTunes)
A couple of short podcasts about the Soviets and their military industrial complex.
Drinking matters (Warwick) (
review,
page in iTunes,
feed in iTunes)
The history of early modern pubs in Europe and their influence on the history of Europe.
Environmental History Videocast (
review,
site,
feed)
A vodcast that goes along with the audio podcast Exploring Environmental History. The videos are not playable on iPod.
Antisemitism (USHMM) (
review,
site,
feed in iTunes)
Scholarly lectures about antisemitism, held at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.
Other:
Cat Crave (
review,
site,
feed)
A podcast for fans of the Carolina Panthers - American Football.
Masters of None (
review,
site,
feed)
A conversational podcast in which, among others, comics and movies are discussed
BMS World Mission (
review,
site,
feed)
A show made for the partners of the Baptist Mission world wide. A rather light radio style program with items related to missionary work.
An introduction to Biological Anthropology (Berkeley) (
review,
site,
feed)
University lecture series that takes on human anthropology from the perspective of evolution and genetics.
Psyconoclasm (
review,
site,
feed)
A psychology podcast that explores psychology in as vast as the definition takes and needs to be met with skepticism.
Subscribe in a reader
Paste the link
http://feeds.feedburner.com/Anne_Is_A_Man
into the RSS reader of your preference. (
What is RSS? - Help on getting subscription)
I love to get new podcast recommendations. You can let me know your preferences by commenting on the blog or sending mail to
Anne is a Man at: Anne Frid de Vries (in one word) AT yahoo DOT co DOT uk
Connect with Anne is a Man on
Facebook,
Twitter
The Podcast Parlor.
He even calls it a new citizenship, though I think it has always been there and needs, as he rightfully points out, be reinforced. To this point, in the last lecture, he looks at policy making itself and shows how the reduction of decision making to cost-benefit analyses, leads to absurd consequences. Some issues have value beyond the monetary and therefore, making a real decision demands of policy makers and the public debate to go beyond cost benefit considerations. He gives a couple of examples, that triggered my own example: noone has suggested we should kill off all citizens beyond the age of 75, even though it almost surely means a huge benefit in cut costs of health and welfare spendings. It is just immoral as everybody knows.
