The issue that I took on first was immediately worth a recommendation. Taking on celebrity atheists was an rich conversation with Terry Eagleton. The most important subject was Eagleton's criticism on the ideas of Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens and their categorical rejection of religion. His point is that they understand very little of religion and in their comparison between science and rationalism with religious foundations basically make a category mistake. They take religious suppositions as factual and theoretic in the way of science.In many ways this is an easy point to make as it is self-evident. Besides, it seems to me Dawkins and Hitchens actually write in reaction to religious people who in fact make exactly the same category mistake. The real strength, I would say, is Eagleton's expose of what is the power of religion, what is the essence of its philosophical and social meaning. In that respect Eagleton exposes a couple of fundamental weak points in a strictly naturalist, materialist view of the universe.
2 comments:
I believe that religion is part of one of many movements and phenomena, as culturales.sociales want to speak, to feel part of algo.No enough to believe in God or belief that basis should be supported and affirmed by a group of people to real and although not an absolute truth.
I know several atheists and I think there's a side that wants to be part of that community because pamparte their beliefs and other ideas that just do not even share ideas underlying the life, the intelligence of others, humility and Values others. These people would not say they are atheists but the worst of the human race.
Probe de decir esto en español.
It seems to me you have run your text through a translation machine (just as I did). Try to say it in Spanish and I will call in my South-American friends to translate properly.
Muchas Gracias,
Anne
Post a Comment